Indexed News on:

--the California "Mega-Park" Project

Tracking measurable success on preserving and connecting California's Parks & Wildlife Corridors

READ OUR EDITOR ON FACEBOOK: facebook.com/rex.frankel
Showing posts with label North Coast. Show all posts
Showing posts with label North Coast. Show all posts

Monday, February 11, 2008

-----

Court Rejects Timber Industry Attack on Threatened Seabird

Marbled murrelets and old-growth forests remain protected

February 5, 2008

Photo of a marbled murrelet
Marbled murrelet
Photo by CA Dept. of Fish & Game

Washington, DC -- A federal district court today rejected the timber industry's latest attack on the marbled murrelet, a small seabird that nests in old-growth trees in the Pacific Northwest. Timber industry lawyers had asked the court to remove Endangered Species Act protections that have been in place since 1992.

The timber industry began its courtroom campaign against the murrelet more than seven years ago. Big timber was given a huge assist in 2004 when the Fish and Wildlife Service was ordered by Julie MacDonald, a political appointee in the Bush Department of the Interior who recently resigned amid scandal over her bullying of agency scientists and political interference with biological decisions, to report that murrelets did not deserve protection in the lower-48 states. This finding reversed government scientists who had concluded the birds continued to need protection. Although currently under investigation by the Inspector General and Government Accounting Office, this last minute flip-flop formed the basis of the timber industry's lawsuit. Had the timber industry's lawsuit been successful, much of the murrelet's old-growth forest habitat would have been open for logging.

"The timber industry tried to play legal games with the fate of an entire species," said Josh Osborne-Klein with Earthjustice. "Thankfully, the court refused to order the extinction of the murrelet."

The marbled murrelet is a small seabird that nests in old growth forests along the Pacific Coast of North America. In 1992, the Fish and Wildlife Service listed the marbled murrelet population in Washington, Oregon, and California as a threatened species due to logging of its old growth habitat. Despite undisputed scientific evidence that murrelets are disappearing from the Pacific coast, the timber industry has set its sights on the small seabird in order to increase logging of trees over 100 years old.

"Unfortunately, the timber industry attack on marbled murrelets is far from over," said Noah Greenwald, a conservation biologist for the Center for Biological Diversity. "The Bush administration has a new proposal to slash protected murrelet habitat by almost 95 percent which may be finalized this spring, but we'll be ready to fight that, too."

Even with the current protections in place, government scientists estimate that the marbled murrelet population in Washington, Oregon, and California continues to decline at a rate of 4 to 7 percent per year. A recent U.S. Geological Survey report estimated that the murrelet population in British Columbia and Alaska is also at risk, declining by 70 percent over the last 25 years.

Represented by Earthjustice, the Audubon Society of Portland, Center for Biological Diversity, Conservation Northwest, Environmental Protection Information Center, Gifford Pinchot Task Force, Oregon Wild, Seattle Audubon Society, Sierra Club, and The Wilderness Society intervened in the timber industry lawsuit to defend the murrelet.

Read the ruling (PDF)

Contact:

Josh Osborne-Klein, Earthjustice, (206) 343-7340, ext. 28
Noah Greenwald, Center for Biological Diversity, (503) 484-7495
Scott Greacen, EPIC, (707) 822-7711

Sunday, September 16, 2007

----------------------------------
In Bankruptcy, Pacific Lumber Starts Selling Off Assets


http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-09-10-companytown_N.htm

Company Town May Lose Company

By John Ritter, USA TODAY Sept. 10, 2007

SCOTIA, Calif. — Tucked among redwood hills on the scenic Eel River, next to a big timber mill, one of America's last true company towns appears to be expiring.

Financial troubles forced Pacific Lumber Co. to refocus on producing redwood and shed extraneous parts, such as the town it built and has benevolently maintained since the 1880s.

Pacific Lumber, or PALCO, wants to sell Scotia's 272 houses, give employees renting them a chance to buy them and get out of the company-town business.

Many residents, some born and raised here, don't know if they can afford their three- and four-bedroom bungalows or what will happen if they buy one and PALCO goes under. Others like the status quo of below-market rents — $650 to $800 a month — complete with company-provided trash-collection, electricity, water and repairs.

PALCO has until Sept. 18 to file a reorganization plan in federal bankruptcy court. The town's sale awaits a decision on whether Scotia, population 1,079, should merge with neighbor Rio Dell or become its own municipality, says company spokeswoman Andrea Arnot.

Either way, change is coming, and many residents say a tight-knit community that leaves its doors unlocked at night and knows everybody's business will lose its character. They worry that part of Scotia, about an hour south of Redwood National Park, will be sold to a retirement-home investor or similar development. "We have tourists drive through here all the time and ask if any of these houses are for sale," says Deb Jeffries, whose husband, Bill, a millwright, was born here.

Fading way of life

Volunteer fire chief John Broadstock says many residents are afraid of change. "They've lived in it the way it was and you can't do that anymore because of economics," he says.

Maxxam, a Houston-based corporation, bought PALCO in 1986, then fought environmentalists in the 1990s over plans to trim debt by harvesting thousands of acres of old-growth redwoods. In 1999, PALCO signed a landmark deal that protected most of that timber.

The company remains mired in debt, despite state-of-the art retooling of its mill and downsizing from 1,200 workers here to fewer than 500. The market for its Douglas fir lumber collapsed in the recent housing slide, says PALCO Vice President Pierce Baymiller.

What's happening here in the world's premier redwood region has happened over the decades to Appalachian coal towns, California citrus towns, Hawaiian pineapple towns, Carolina chicken towns and New England mill towns.

Company towns faded as the culture changed, not least of which was workers who could afford cars to commute and not have to live next door to the boss. A lot of towns dried up in the upheaval of the Great Depression and post-World War II years. Sometimes a town's reason to exist — timber, gold, silver — played out. Towns such as Richland and Grand Coulee, Wash.; Brookings, Ore., and Potlatch, Idaho, lost their company identities but adapted and survived.

Scotia's likely fate — sold off by PALCO — has been the fate of other towns, says Linda Carlson, a Seattle consultant and author of Company Towns of the Pacific Northwest. But with some mill towns especially, companies sometimes simply picked them up and moved them on rails to new forests to harvest.

Many towns weren't built to last more than a decade or two. They had cesspools instead of sewers, no foundations under the houses, crude street infrastructures. "When environmental controls became a big issue, it was easier to shut a lot of them down," Carlson says.

She thinks a handful still operate on the traditional formula with a church or two, a school, company stores, maybe a post office and Boy Scout troop.

"Very few were incorporated," she says. "It might literally have been a stretch along a river."

Scotia was — and is — much more. It has an elementary school, an inn, a small shopping center, a museum, a theater and ball fields, all in cozy proximity to the hulking mill. This year's garden contest was the town's 87th annual.

'One big family'

"It's one big family in this town," says Leah Willis, whose husband, Jason, grew up here. "If my kids are doing something wrong up the street, I get another parent calling. When somebody's hurting, the town's there for you."

The Willises hope to buy their three-bedroom house for around $175,000. Beyond intending to sell at "fair market value," PALCO hasn't said anything about home prices. "We'll have programs to help people get in them," Arnot says. "We'll work very hard at that."

Jim Gleaton, 62, terminated last month in the latest round of layoffs after 44 years, was interested in buying his house and retiring here where he raised three children. In the old days, when PALCO workers retired they had to move. Gleaton isn't sure now if he could swing a mortgage.

"A lot of young families are desperate to know if they're going to have a job," he says. "Why would you buy a home and have no job?"

Christina McGee, 27, and her husband, Bryan, 28, a machine operator at the mill, have two small children and pay $695 a month rent. He makes about $40,000 a year, she earns $10,000 working at PALCO Pharmacy.

"We'd love to buy. We can't wait for details to be finalized," Christina McGee says. If her husband were laid off or the mill closed, "we'd probably have to move out of the area."

Bill and Deb Jeffries are in their third Scotia house in 28 years. She'd like to buy their house, but he's not sure.

"My concern if they sell the houses to just anybody, is the town still going to look like this?" Bill Jeffries says. "That's why I'd love to leave it like this, renting, because then it can stay like this."

MORE STORIES ON PACIFIC LUMBER COMPANY:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4188/is_20070102/ai_n17089884

http://www.headwaterspreserve.org/html/updates_update_54.html

http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070120/NEWS/701200303/1033/NEWS01

http://www.northcoastjournal.com/040507/towndandy0405.html

Thursday, September 6, 2007

-------------------------
Judge Rejects Political Manipulation of the Endangered Species Act


Monumental Victory for Wild Salmon and Steelhead!

- June 14, 2007 - http://www.pacrivers.org

In a long awaited decision, a federal judge set aside a controversial Bush administration policy that aimed to weaken protections for wild salmon and steelhead, calling it scientifically flawed and contrary to the Endangered Species Act. As we've known all along, salmon recovery depends on how we manage habitat, not hatchery fish, and this ruling once again puts the federal fisheries agency on the right track to wild salmon and steelhead recovery.

The federal "Hatchery Listing Policy" was adopted in 2005 and opened the door to political manipulation of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) through listing decisions for salmon and steelhead species. The policy required NOAA Fisheries to lump together hatchery-raised fish and wild fish when making decisions about whether or not to grant ESA protections to specific Pacific salmon and steelhead stocks. We submitted extensive comments throughout this process and are glad that science prevailed - and that policy was overturned. In the same ruling, the judge threw out the downlisting of the Upper Columbia River steelhead from endangered to threatened (a less-protected status under the ESA) - ruling it as unlawful due to its reliance on the "fatally deficient" hatchery policy.

A big congratulations to our colleagues that were also on this case: Trout Unlimited, National Wildlife Federation, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermens' Associations, Institute for Fisheries Resources, Oregon Wild, Klamath Forest Alliance, Wild Steelhead Coalition, Native Fish Society and Federation of Fly Fishers -- and another thank you to our attorneys at Earthjustice.

To all of of our members and supporters, THANK YOU for your continued support and making this victory possible!

Below is the full press release.

Click here to learn more.

Click here to donate to PRC.

PRC's new email update is our way of letting you know the latest river and watershed conservation news. Let us know what you think!

*******

Press Release -- June 13, 2007

Federal Hatchery Policy Plays Politics with Salmon Science: Judge Throws it Out

Today Judge Coughenour invalidated the Bush Administration's 2005 Hatchery Listing Policy and restored the endangered species listing for the Upper Columbia Steelhead. The judge held that the Hatchery Policy's consideration of hatchery fish when deciding whether to list wild salmon as endangered violates the Endangered Species Act because it ignores the best science and the main purpose of the ESA -- to recover wild populations.

"The Endangered Species Act requires that listing of species be determined by the 'best available scientific information,'" said Chris Frissell, salmon research ecologist and Senior Staff Scientist with the Pacific Rivers Council. "The Hatchery Listing Policy ignores a large body of science and a century of management experience affirming that wild salmon recovery will depend on how we manage habitat and fishing, not hatchery fish."

"It's habitat restoration and the health of wild salmon bred in streams and rivers that will determine salmon recovery," said Frissell. "Counting fish that originated from hatcheries is an ecological delusion - it has always masked what is really happening to wild salmon populations and the rivers they depend on to survive. The overwhelming weight of scientific evidence is that hatchery fish contribute to the decline of wild stocks."

PRC agrees with the judge that "floods of hatchery fish can result in the appearance of a well-stocked fishery, though in actuality it would not be so without human interference." It was the apparent abundance of Upper Columbia steelhead that led the National Marine Fisheries Service to downlist the steelhead from endangered to threatened based upon its policy. The problem, however, is that although hatchery steelhead may be abundant, wild Upper Columbia steelhead are in grave danger of extinction. The judge explained that the central purpose of the ESA is to protect these wild fish, so even abundance of hatchery fish cannot be an excuse to limit protections for the wild fish under the ESA.

"The Bush administration's adoption of the hatchery policy was a political move, part of a strategy to rollback environmental protections through administrative changes," said Bronwen Wright, Policy Analyst at the Pacific Rivers Council. "The administration knows what the law requires, and it knows that the public overwhelmingly supports the Endangered Species Act. That is why the administration has repeatedly tried to decrease environmental protections by changing obscure agency policies."

According to Frissell, "the problem is that hatchery fish are essentially a political commodity. If governments believe they can buy their way out of real salmon recovery and avoid the hard job of habitat protection with more or 'better' hatchery fish, they will do that. At its core, the hatchery policy embraced the same scientifically bankrupt management delusions that led to the decimation of salmon runs on both coasts of North America."

Contact:

Mary Scurlock, Pacific Rivers Council, 503-320- 0712 or 503-228-3555.

#######

---------------------

North Coast Railroad Reality Check

http://humboldtbaykeeper.org

Hearing on Wednesday, August 29

The North Coast Railroad Authority is holding a public scoping hearing in preparation for an Environmental Impact Report on restoring rail service from Willits south to Lombard. Wait a second – NCRA already requested funding for rail all the way north to Samoa. Aren’t they supposed to include the whole project, including Humboldt County? The answer is yes – and we plan to raise this concern at the scoping hearing in a few weeks. Join us for the hearing – we’re planning a carpool caravan to Santa Rosa:

Railroad Scoping Hearing
Wednesday, August 29th, 7:00-9:00pm
Santa Rosa City Hall
100 Santa Rosa Avenue, Santa Rosa

You can also send us your comments on the proposed railway project and we’ll bring them to Santa Rosa for you. Talking points are below – or contact us for more information at 268-0664 or email Pete.

Talking Points for Railroad Scoping Hearing
* Economic feasibility for the defined rail project depends upon the full stretch from Lombard to Samoa – how can we evaluate the impacts of half a project?
* Funding has been requested for the full project – so why is the environmental study only addressing half the project?
* NCRA has been inconsistent in its statements about the timeline for the project. What criteria will be used to determine the accuracy of planning and timing for this project?

------------------------------------

Bush's Spotted Owl Plan is Sellout to Big Timber:

Sept. 6, 2007, http://tws.org

If the Bush Administration has its way, the northern spotted owl could go the way of the dodo.

The Administration has released a "Draft Spotted Owl Recovery Plan" that is seriously flawed. The galling thing about it: they know it's a bad plan! It failed a recent scientific peer review and rolls back more than a decade of wildlife protections by reducing critical habitat for owls, AND SELLING ANCIENT FORESTS TO BIG TIMBER.

Now we have another opportunity for you to speak out.

Our rare old-growth forests and the species within deserve the highest protections. Instead, they are in the hands of Undersecretary of Agriculture, Mark Rey, a former top lobbyist for the timber industry!

He's hoping to keep the new plans under the radar. We need your help to ensure that the Bush Administration knows—without a doubt—that we're watching every attempt to open America's ancient forests to logging.

Click here now to ask Undersecretary Rey to withdraw this terrible plan.

The Bush Administration seems to think that genuine wildlife protections are unimportant, but we disagree! The plan would open fragile land to development, decreasing habitat ranges for the spotted owl.

They call it a "Recovery Plan" for the spotted owl, but it seems their only goal is to recover more profits for Big Timber. We must protect the last remaining ancient forests and all they hold, like the northern spotted owl, an endangered species whose numbers are dwindling.

More than 24,000 Wilderness Society activists contacted the Fish and Wildlife Service about the flawed spotted owl recovery plan. But there's more we can do.

Please join me in calling for the immediate withdrawal of this plan!

Click here to take action today.

Thank you for all that you do for our ancient forests and so many other wild places.

Kathy Kilmer
The Wilderness Society

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

-------------------------------

Northern California Wilderness Bill and Riverside County's San Timoteo Canyon Preservation Tops Sunset Magazine Eco-Success List


excerpt from Sunset Magazine


Paradise preserved
The West’s top 10 environmental success stories

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17582684/

3. Northern California Coastal Wild Heritage Wilderness Act: Signed into law last fall, the Northern California Coastal Wild Heritage Wilderness Act set aside 275,000 acres of new wilderness and designated the newest federal Wild and Scenic River — a 21-mile stretch of the Black Butte River in Mendocino County. The new wilderness is not one contiguous swath but adds acreage or protection to various wildlands, like the King Range (north of Fort Bragg) and the Cache Creek area. And it protects everything from amazing wildflower displays to imperiled salmon and steelhead runs. Lands will be managed by the U.S. Forest Service or Bureau of Land Management. Learn more: www.wilderness.net/ or www.wilderness.org/WhereWeWork/California/NCaliforniaWild.cfm


4. San Timoteo Canyon, California: Big tracts of open land aren’t easy to come by in Southern California, much less conserve. But in the case of San Timoteo Canyon, a 174-acre land donation from producer Gale Anne Hurd (The Terminator, Aliens) got the ball rolling. The Riverside Land Conservancy and other organizations have helped acquire an additional 8,000 acres in San Timoteo Canyon and are well on the way toward a goal of 10,000 acres for a future state park (the park is designated, but it’s not yet open to the public). Learn more: www.riversidelandconservancy.org/ or 951/788-0670


Redwood National Park Grows


New Addition to Redwood National Park lands; BLM's new Lacks Creek property a hidden treasure

John Driscoll, Eureka Times-Standard

05/11/2007

http://times-standard.com/local/ci_5871540

A purple carpet of western hound's tongue is unrolled under oaks leafing out in the sun after a long winter.

From these oak-rimmed prairies, you can look west over all of the Lacks Creek watershed, 11,000 acres that are remote more because of topography than distance. You can plainly make out where the stream runs into Redwood Creek, which flows into the ocean at Orick. The coastal fog bank is just a couple of ridges away.

”On a clear day you can see the ocean,” said U.S. Bureau of Land Management forest ecologist Hank Harrison. “I think the public got a nice piece of land here.”

Last year another major part of the drainage was bought by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management with help from private conservation groups. In a $5.5 million deal including $2.5 million from the Save-the-Redwoods League and money from the Resource Legacy Foundation Fund, 4,500 acres was procured from the Barnum Timber Co., Eel River Sawmills and landowner Veena Menda.

It gave BLM the majority of the watershed, adding to 4,100 acres it already owned, including a large chunk which the agency has held since the land was public domain. More than 1,500 acres are decadent old-growth fir, much of it perched precariously on steep west-facing slopes below Pine Ridge.

In early May, everything is lush. Sprawling meadows sprout green grasses and old Douglas fir glades shade fairy slipper orchids and late-blooming trillium. The eastern half of the watershed will be bone dry in a month or two.

Lacks Creek splits the land into two geologic types. The east-side slopes are subject to slides because of their steepness, even though their thick layers of well-cemented sandstone aren't very erosive. The well-drained, rocky soil makes the forest dry, supporting canyon live oak, Douglas fir, manzanita and madrone, according to a BLM geologic assessment report.

The west side, in contrast, has highly productive and moist soils on rolling hills. Thinner sandstone and mudstone layers are crushed into rocks more easily, and are further broken down into clay-like soils on which trees -- even some redwood and western red cedar -- thrive.

Firs on the western side below Beaver Ridge are thick-trunked but young. The heavy logging done throughout the watershed in the 1950s left some stands struggling to rebound on the eastern side, while trees on the western portion shot up. They are now dense, and in some stands there is a choking layer of tan oaks.

Harrison said there are some places with 600 trees per acre, which is beginning to stunt tree growth and could set up the place for a big wildfire. He hopes the former timberlands can be thinned out in the near future, down to 250 trees an acre, then later to fewer than 75.

Logging didn't begin here in earnest until the 1950s. Champion, Weyerhaeuser, Soper-Wheeler, Mutual Plywood and Simpson Timber all owned land here, among others. Starting in about 1954, logs began moving out in a hurry, with hundreds of roads and skid trails carved into the hillsides to get the cut out. Aerial photos clearly show the rapid changes on the land.

Perhaps fortunately for BLM, some of the better-maintained roads would do just fine as trails. The agency's longtime outdoor recreation planner Bruce Cann sees potential in linking segments of old roads with new sections of trail, creating several lengthy loops that could be enjoyed by hikers, horseback riders and mountain bikers.

”I think I could find three ways to get across the creek, but it's not going to be easy,” Cann said, peering at a map and pointing out roads on the landscape.

BLM wants to present the public with ideas on how Lacks Creek might be managed, and has been gathering information on the area's history, biology and geology. Any plan will have to go through the requisite National Environmental Policy Act process, through which the public can express their desires for the property, alternatives are developed and eventually a plan is adopted.

That process starts next week with a meeting in Arcata.

One of Bob Barnum's wishes when he sold his part of the property to BLM was that the prairies be maintained. Even with cows grazing on the grasslands -- and without the old wildfire regimen -- fir trees creep in from their edges, threatening to transform the meadows into young forest. Small fir trees will likely have to be mechanically removed to preserve the prairies.

Getting from Hundred-Acre Field down to Lacks Creek is a lesson in the “it's just around the next corner” point of view. Today you have to guess which logging spur will get you down the fastest and then which slope you can negotiate without sliding uncontrollably.

But Lacks Creek is there, and it's likely that eventually it'll be a lot easier to get there.

Water moves over boulders and under huge fir trees that have fallen across the creek banks on its way toward Redwood Creek below 4,092-foot Hupa Mountain and past the verdant Stover Ranch downstream. Coho and chinook salmon and cutthroat and steelhead use the 7 3/4-mile-long stream, which is eligible to be designated a federal Wild and Scenic River.

The whole place is considered an Area of Critical Environmental Concern, and is enveloped within the Redwood National Park protection zone set up by the legislation that authorized the expansion of the park in 1978.

Right now, most of the place is a bit under used, and in some spots a little abused. There are a few abandoned campgrounds, some litter and some jeep trails torn through meadows. In one spot, a bullet-pocked oxygen tank lies under an oak.

But for the most part, the area is clean. Wildlife is plentiful, with evidence of elk and northern spotted owls and expectedly quite a few fishers. From the edge of one mixed stand a turkey called until it heard footsteps moving in its direction.

Without a doubt, there is plenty of potential in the Lacks Creek area, especially because of its proximity to the coast. It's only about 45 minutes from Arcata, and it is far enough inland to escape the summer coastal fog.

”The more people we have up here will really help the area,” said Lynda Roush, BLM's Arcata Field Office manager.

A management plan is beginning to be crafted to protect wildlife and fisheries and their habitat while developing opportunities for hiking, horseback riding and mountain biking in Lacks Creek. The first public meeting to take comments and questions will be held on Wednesday at 6 p.m. at the BLM Arcata Field Office at 1695 Heindon Rd. in Arcata.


Huge Redwood Forest Deal on North Mendocino Coast




















Over 50,000 acres of Redwood Forest Next to Sinkyone State Park and the King Range is Saved from Development


June 15, 2007

Group buys forest to log, shield it from development

By Tim Reiterman, L.A. Times Staff Writer

With 100% financing from the Bank of America, a nonprofit conservation group has purchased 50,000 acres of redwood forest along the Mendocino County coast north of Fort Bragg for $65 million and plans to use it for commercial timber harvesting while shielding the land from development. "We know that this property without protection would have been subdivided into smaller parcels," Art Harwood, a sawmill operator and president of the Redwood Forest Foundation, told reporters Thursday in the redwood grove outside the Transamerica Pyramid in San Francisco. "Every year in the U.S., millions of acres of forest are bought and sold, and the pressure is particularly high in Northern California."

Bank and foundation officials said the deal is the first of its kind that relies entirely on private financing. However, much of the debt is to be paid through the sale of a conservation easement to another nonprofit group that plans to seek state funding.

Harwood said the land, acquired from Hawthorne Timber Co., was heavily logged in the 1980s and '90s and now consists primarily of second-growth redwood and Douglas fir. "There are a few old-growth trees scattered out there, but we will not be cutting them," he said.

Foundation officials said they plan to do very little logging at first, and never on more than 3% of the property a year to ensure a long-term supply of jobs and timber. The Redwood Forest Foundation, which is dedicated to restoring working forests, plans to use logging revenue to help pay off the 20-year loan. The foundation, based in the southern Mendocino County town of Gualala, intends to sell the conservation easement to the Conservation Fund, which plans to use state money approved by voters last year in Proposition 84, the clean water, parks and coastal bond measure.

"We haven't negotiated the cost of the easement and the terms," said Chris Kelly, who manages California operations for the fund. "But our intention is to have an agreement allowing no subdivision, development or conversion to non-forest uses, and possibly there will be a cap on harvesting." The land is north of Fort Bragg and about 50 miles north of two other parcels purchased recently by the Conservation Fund.

---------------------------------------------- http://blogs.business2.com/greenwombat/2007/06/redwood_summer_.html

Bank of America CEO Kenneth Lewis appeared in a redwood grove in downtown San Francisco today - the urban redwoods are planted next to the Transamerica Pyramid - to announce a first-of-its kind deal: the bank is providing 100 percent financing to the non-profit Redwood Forest Foundation to acquire 50,635 acres of redwood timberlands on Northern California's Lost Coast. The acquisition is part of BofA's (BAC) $20 billion green lending initiative. What makes the $65 million deal unique is that the foundation will continue to log the Usal Redwood Forest in Mendocino County, albeit on a much reduced scale and in conjunction with the restoration of the forest ecosystem. The foundation, which is buying the land from the Hawthorne Timber Company, will sell a conservation easement to ensure the forest remains intact in perpetuity and to pay down the debt it owes BofA.

--------------------------------------

For more info, click here: http://www.rffi.org/UsalRedwoodForest.html

also here:
http://www.rffi.org/Usal-PR-2007-06.html

Bank of America and Redwood Forest Foundation Announce Nation's First Private Capital Forest Acquisition by Nonprofit Transaction Helps Protect California's Usal Redwood Forest

SAN FRANCISCO, CA — Bank of America and the Redwood Forest Foundation (RFFI) today announced the country's first forest acquisition by a nonprofit using 100 percent private capital to close the deal. The transaction preserves more than 50,000 acres of critical working timberland in the Usal Redwood Forest, just north of Fort Bragg in Northern California's Mendocino County. This transaction will stop the forest's fragmentation while also allowing the property's coastal redwood trees to grow and be managed as a working sustainable forest. The foundation will purchase the acreage from Hawthorne Timber Company using $65 million in flexible long-term financing from Bank of America.

This unique structure provides a national model for nonprofit ownership of a forest, and enables local environmentalists and timber companies to implement sustainable timber practices that sustain jobs and tax base while protecting critical ecological areas. The transaction also provides a return on investment for Bank of America.

"This is the beginning of a new era for our local community," said Art Harwood, President of RFFI. "We are banding together to protect and manage our forests. We are pulling together private capital, and the hopes and aspirations of people from all walks of life to create a bright beacon for our future. We are doing this by ending the 30 years of fighting, and focusing on what unites us."

"Some of the trees we are protecting were saplings before Bank of America was founded in San Francisco in 1904," said Kenneth D. Lewis, Bank of America chairman and CEO. "This is one of the most significant transactions of our recently announced $20 billion environmental initiative. We are honored to protect a California legacy and one of the environment's most precious resources." Don Kemp, RFFI's Executive Director added, "We anticipate that this project will be the first of many in which the global capital markets will be tapped to finance projects more traditionally considered the domain of the public sector. We look forward to working with the entire community to manage our Redwood forests so that jobs and environmental benefits will be maintained for decades to come." RFFI's oversight of the forest will preserve open space, restore the quality of the Redwood forest, purify waterways, enhance wildlife habitat and maintain family wage jobs for those who depend on forests for their livelihoods. Upon fulfilling its financial obligations, RFFI will continue to sustainably harvest timber and reinvest in the community as determined by RFFI.
------------------------------------------------

TERRAIN MAGAZINE ARTICLE ON HAWTHORNE TIMBER SALES TO ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS AND THE STATE, SPRING 2006
http://ecologycenter.org/terrain/article.php?id=13514


Forests for the Funding
by Katie Renz

They've filed numerous lawsuits challenging timber harvest plans, operated their own independent sawmill, demonstrated in the streets, and supported protesters sitting in the tallest trees. Now they're taking the next logical step: Mendocino County residents Linda Perkins and Bill Heil are fighting for the forest by buying it.

The couple, both 65, had already devoted ten years to full-time activism when, in 1997, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation decided to sell 200,000 acres of timberland in Mendocino County. "The time was ripe for a change in how the forests were owned," Perkins says. While unsustainable logging—and the subsequent destruction of forest ecosystems—generated millions of dollars for corporate headquarters in Portland and Atlanta, the couple's small community of Albion, like scores of other Northern California mill towns, suffered a boom and bust economy.

A few months prior to the sale, Mendocino County's then-Supervisor, Charles Peterson, proposed that a representative group of locals, from third-generation foresters to Earth First!ers like Perkins and Heil, come together to buy and manage timberland for public use. The vision entailed a working landscape supporting selective harvesting and recreation, with profits recycled through the community, as opposed to its likely alternatives: further logging or cutting up the land for development.

But where would the money come from? Financial services company US Forest Capital suggested seeking alternative strategies, such as tapping into tax-exempt bond markets, to fund these mega-land grabs.

Heil explains why this strategy was so compatible with Peterson's plan for a "working forest": "If you have less to pay back on the interest, you have less forest you have to cut down to pay it back. On a local level, we realized that we had to take control. As these big companies were moving out, it was the time to acquire the base of production."

The first attempt failed: The nascent Redwood Forest Foundation International (RFFI, or as Perkins fondly calls it, "Reffie") had only existed for a couple of months when they lost the bid on the LP property.

Eight years and about a hundred meetings later, the organization is involved in closing its first successful deal: with Hawthorne-Campbell, the timberland investment group that snagged Georgia-Pacific's 194,000 acres (RFFI also tried to buy the whole plot). Hawthorne-Campbell is selling RFFI 16,000 acres of overharvested—but relatively healthy—forest land along Salmon Creek and Big River for $48.5 million.

At first, Hawthorne-Campbell wasn't interested, but as Perkins describes it, "conversation continued." About a year later, RFFI teamed up with the Conservation Fund, a national nonprofit that protects land through conservation easement and then turns the management over to another party.

"We simply don't have enough public money to buy and preserve large tracts as park land," Perkins says, underlining the group's biggest hurdle. As Heil puts it, "We understand the ecology of the forest, but the funding? It was a strong learning curve for eight to ten years, and we still are in that process."

The partnership with the Conservation Fund, which has protected five million acres and counting across the country, was invaluable for RFFI, ensuring economic resources and a reputable track record. Funding also came from loans through the federal Clean Water Act and the state water board. These were monies, Perkins says, intended for projects such as sewage treatment but that often regulate buffer zones around creeks and rivers to prevent sedimentation. "So it's a little bit innovative, what we're asking for," she acknowledges.

The immediate goal—"to wrest this land away from outside corporate ownership," says Heil—is accomplished. Albion residents will now be able to walk along their natural waterways, previously inaccessible without trespassing on corporate-owned property.

The next challenge—to repair eroded hillsides, restore the native salmon population, and regenerate a hardy ecosystem—will test RFFI's mettle. As the first nonprofit to receive its charter to manage a forest, there aren't many models to follow; logging the land to pay back loans will require a keen balance between ecological stewardship and economic reality. Heil guesses that in perhaps 40 years the debt will be settled, leaving the next generation of Albionians to determine how many trees they want to cut.

These first 16,000 acres are just a foot in the door. Much of the land Hawthorne-Campbell owns is broken into outlying pieces, some with ocean views or near roads. From a real estate point of view, these pieces are perfect to subdivide and sell for profit; for Perkins and Heil, the plots are ideal to manage on a watershed level. According to Perkins, Hawhorne-Campbell just sold for development the last wildlife corridor that crosses between Albion River and Salmon Creek. They hope RFFI can step in before chainsaws and construction crews arrive.

What the forest will look like in 40 years—subdivided and just a memory or a working ecosystem controlled by locals—is still in question. But Heil, Perkins, and the "most unusual collaboration" of RFFI, are proving that while money may not grow on trees, whole forests just might be able to grow on money.



--------------------------------

Humboldt Bay Eco-News


7-12-07 news from www.humboldtbaykeeper.org

Humboldt Bay Corridor – Trail? Trains? Traffic? Speak Out Now!

Are we ever going to be able to safely walk, pedal, or picnic along the Humboldt Bay Trail? The answer depends on a constellation of decisions now under discussion in our community. Will we dredge the Bay to bring in giant container ships and rebuild the costly railroad – build a hill at Indianola to save 66 seconds of travel time from Arcata to Eureka – or increase access to the Bay and encourage alternative transportation with a Humboldt Bay Trail?

Humboldt Baykeeper Director Pete Nichols spoke out about port and railway development with the "Letter of the Week" in last week’s Arcata Eye. You can voice your support for the Humboldt Bay Trail and Humboldt Bay protection in a number of ways:

Letters to the Editor: North Coast Journal cover story (July 5, 2007)
Check out Hank Sims' article, "The Squeeze," in last week's Journal and write a letter to the editor of any local paper about your feelings on the Humboldt Bay Trail/101 Corridor, and what you’d like to see there.

Caltrans Highway 101 Project Public Meeting: Tuesday, August 7 at 5pm, Adorni Center, Eureka
Caltrans is proposing a $60 million “improvement” to the Eureka-Arcata corridor, which would elevate the highway at Indianola but fail to offer bike or pedestrian safety improvements. The draft Environmental Impact Study (EIS) was recently released and this meeting offers the opportunity to comment on the project. If you can’t make it, visit the Caltrans website to read and comment on the draft EIS.

California Legislature: Change NCRA’s Mandate!
While public sentiment favors the Humboldt Bay Trail, the North Coast Railroad Authority continues to cite its State Legislature-defined mandate as the reason it must deny our community this affordable and practical trail. Contact our State Senator Pat Wiggins to let her know that the NCRA’s current mandate does not serve our community and should be changed! And while you’re at it, visit our website to contact local elected officials as well.

For more information on the Humboldt Bay Trail, port development, and how you can get involved, contact us at 268-0664 or email Pete.

Baykeeper Challenges Illegal Activities On The Balloon Track --4-12-07

On Friday, April 6, Humboldt Baykeeper took action to address violations of the Clean Water Act by Security National, the owners of the Balloon Track property in Eureka. Recently, a construction team began unpermitted and illegal road-building activities that, according to the Eureka Reporter, “was a step towards readying the parcel for the proposed mixed-use Marina Center,” a project that has not yet been approved by either the City of Eureka or the California Coastal Commission.

The violations include unpermitted soil disturbing activities and the dredge and fill of material in and around the wetlands on the Balloon Track. “The site hasn’t been fully assessed for contaminants,” noted Baykeeper Director Pete Nichols. Baykeeper is already pursuing litigation against Security National and Union Pacific Railroad over toxic substances present on the site, which must be cleaned up to stop contamination of Humboldt Bay. Baykeeper believes that no development can be pursued on the property until the pollution is removed.

Read the Humboldt Baykeeper press release and the newspaper articles at our website, www.humboldtbaykeeper.org.

-----------------------------------

Development Rights at Two Humboldt County Ranches Bought


2-1-07

http://www.nature.org/wherewework/northamerica/states/california/features/northcoast.html

California’s wild North Coast is home to unparalleled natural abundance—lush coastal forests, rolling oak woodlands and vast watersheds with hundreds of rivers, streams and creeks. Working farms and ranches—mostly dairy and cattle—span huge tracts of open space. One of the last undeveloped coastal areas in California, the North Coast is a place where the pace of development has not yet overtaken the pace of conservation.

But all that could change. Pressure to develop housing subdivisions and convert large working lands into smaller “ranchettes” is a growing threat that could fragment vital lands and waters. To abate this threat, The Nature Conservancy and the Northcoast Regional Land Trust (NRLT) have formed a new collaboration to help both groups better protect the North Coast’s watersheds, wildlife and local economies.

Collaborating to Produce Results

In August 2006, the Conservancy helped NRLT purchase conservation easements on two working ranches in Humboldt County. The 4,700-acre Iaqua Ranch and 1,280-acre Price Creek Ranch both contain miles of salmon-bearing streams and important forest and woodland habitat. In both cases, The Nature Conservancy provided expertise in real estate transactions, the creation of conservation easements and scientific planning. NRLT provided knowledge of the landscape and the community, and fostered relationships with local landowners.

“It makes sense to work together,” says George Yandell, director of the Conservancy’s North Coast Project. “Our two organizations have similar missions and a shared vision for conservation in the North Coast.”

Jim Petruzzi, executive director of the Northcoast Regional Land Trust (NRLT), agrees.

“We can get a lot more done together,” says Petruzzi. “Working collaboratively means we can share our strengths and resources.”

Since forming in 2000, NRLT has achieved notable success with the protection of more than 6,300 acres of working landscapes and natural areas in the region. Their strong reputation has resulted in a waiting list of landowners interested in donating conservation easements.

“We have a problem of riches,” jokes Petruzzi, “just like the North Coast itself. Residents here recognize that the North Coast is uniquely rich in natural resources like forests and streams, and they want to protect these valuable riches.”

Purchase of conservation easements at the Iaqua Ranch and Price Creek Ranch are just the beginning. Over the next year, The Nature Conservancy and NRLT will draft a conservation action plan for the region and work on more easement transactions. By working together, The Nature Conservancy and the Northcoast Regional Land Trust will be more effective and efficient at protecting the North Coast’s rich resources for future generations.

“In five years time, I hope we’ll see a lot more easements in the North Coast,” says Petruzzi. “Easements protect everything that North Coast residents value—open space, forests, streams for fish, and working farms and ranches.”

Story on Garcia watershed purchase in 2005: http://www.nature.org/wherewework/northamerica/states/california/press/press1824.html

----------------------------------

Conversion of Sonoma County's Forests to Vineyards Fought


Sierra Club, Redwood Chapter Press Release
Preservation Ranch Video
For immediate distribution: May 8, 2007

See also: http://www.redwood.sierraclub.org/sonoma/Forest.html

The Redwood Chapter of the Sierra Club has just released a short video designed to educate the public and decision-makers about the proposed Preservation Ranch vineyard development project. The video is posted on the YouTube web site at the following URL. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIrJRc4P94Q

The short video clip, “Worse than a Clearcut” is the first use of YouTube by the local Sierra Club to educate the public about the environmentally destructive Preservation Ranch project. The video highlights the role of CalPERS, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, in facilitating this project through an investment of $200 million with Premier Pacific Vineyards.

Distribution of this short video clip through YouTube is one component of a wider public education campaign. Similar videos about Preservation Ranch will be distributed through other web sites, and on DVD in order to inform key decision-makers.

Preservation Ranch is the latest in a long series of environmental assaults on western Sonoma County forests. After years of environmentally destructive logging, Sonoma County forests now face the additional threat of permanent development and conversion to vineyards. Numerous western Sonoma County forest conversions have been approved in the past, but the Preservation Ranch proposal is more than twice as large as all previous proposed and approved conversions combined since 1989.

Soon after acquiring 19,000 acres of western Sonoma County, (an area almost twenty times larger than Golden Gate Park in San Francisco), Premier Pacific Vineyards announced the Preservation Ranch project. Important aspects of the proposed project appear to have changed over time, but recent proposals have included conversion of some portion of the 19,000 acres of forest to vineyards. The current proposal includes 1,665 acres of vineyard development, more than 200 acres of vineyard development on other land, and 90 “vineyard estates”. Beyond its 19,000 acres, Preservation Ranch will set a dangerous precedent of development for the rest of western Sonoma County and the North Coast.

Redwood Chapter Chair Margaret Pennington expressed confidence that public education can stop this destructive proposal. “The people of California care about protecting the environment. I don’t believe that the public employees who are members of CalPERS want their investment being used to permanently destroy California forests. This video is one important tool for getting the message to the larger community.”

Previous discussions between the Redwood Chapter and CalPERS concerning Preservation Ranch have been unfruitful. CalPERS has defended the Preservation Ranch project on the grounds that Preservation Ranch will comply with the state and local law. In response to this assertion, Jay Halcomb, the Chair of the Forest Protection Committee noted that, “Not everything that is legal is a good idea. Surely CalPERS has a higher environmental standard than the bare minimum required by law. CalPERS should demonstrate responsible environmental stewardship, not just what they can get away with legally.”

The CalPERS Board of Administration is found at: http://www.calpers.ca.gov/index.jsp?bc=/about/organization/board/home.xml

----------------------------

Mendocino County Ranch's Development Rights Purchased


6-13-07

http://www.mendocinolandtrust.org/?Home:What%27s_New

Ridgewood Ranch Oak Woodlands Conservation Easement Finalized

The Mendocino Land Trust has purchased a 1,689-acre conservation easement from the Golden Rule Church Association on the historic Ridgewood Ranch in Willits, California. The conservation easement permanently conserves conifer forest, oak woodland, and rangeland on Ridgewood Ranch. It is the second of several conservation easements that are proposed on the 5,000-acre ranch – home to the legendary racehorse Seabiscuit. The $2 million purchase price for the Oak Woodlands Conservation Easement is substantially less than market value and represents a significant bargain sale from the landowner, the Golden Rule Church Association. For more of this press release click here.

“We are delighted to have conserved the Ranch’s oak woodlands, and we could not have achieved this milestone without the support of the California Wildlife Conservation Board and a generous donation of value by the landowner, the Golden Rule Church Association, “ said Mendocino Land Trust Executive Director James Bernard.

Ridgewood Ranch has eight types of oaks and 2,250 acres of oak woodlands in total. California’s oak woodlands sustain higher levels of biodiversity than virtually any other terrestrial ecosystem in the state. More than 300 species depend on oak woodlands for food and shelter. Intact oak woodlands protect soils from erosion and landslides, regulate water flow in watersheds, and maintain water quality in streams and rivers.

The California Wildlife Conservation Board provided a grant to the Land Trust for the acquisition of the conservation easement on the oak woodlands and associated costs. “We were very pleased to provide funding to the Mendocino Land Trust to protect the oak woodlands of Ridgewood Ranch,” said WCB Executive Director John Donnelly. “We are excited to see the pieces coming together to conserve this beautiful Ranch.”

The conservation easement includes 4.75 miles of Riparian Protection Area that follows portions of Walker and Forsythe Creeks (fish bearing streams) and seven miles of critical Class II tributaries of the two creeks. To afford special features the best protection, a “wet meadow” and a vernal pool are also included in the Oak Woodlands conservation easement although they are located geographically inside a proposed Agricultural Conservation Easement area adjacent to the Oak Woodlands acreage. “The members of the Golden Rule Church Association appreciate the support of the Wildlife Conservation Board and its staff and the cooperation of the Land Trust in working out the conservation easement,” said Tracy Livingston, representative of the Church. “We agreed to sell the conservation easement at considerably less than its value, because we believe that conserving the Ranch is the right thing to do.”

The conservation easement calls for 15 days of limited public access for passive recreation at no charge to the public that will be in addition to the six days of public access to the Ridgewood Ranch Redwoods Conservation Easement that was completed in March 2005. The Oak Woodlands Conservation Easement will completely surround a large second growth redwoods grove, which was been conserved with the assistance of the Save-the-Redwoods League.

The total purchase price of conservation easements protecting the Ranch’s redwoods, working agricultural lands, oak woodlands, working forestland, and transportation corridor is $6 million, covering some 4,500 acres of land, including nearly 5 miles of steelhead creeks, 2,250 acres of oak woodlands, and 3.5 miles of frontage on Highway 101. To date, the Mendocino Land Trust has received funding commitments from state and federal sources for $4.8 million.

For more information on the Ridgewood Ranch Conservation Area Project, visit

www.mendocinolandtrust.org

LA meetuphikes.org

E-Mail the editor:

rexfrankel at yahoo.com

Blog Archive

Quick-Search of Subjects on the Site