ConnectingCalifornia.org: For more places to hike, climb and explore, and Trails within 15 minutes of every California home and workplace. OUR GOAL: Connecting California with 1000 Miles of Parks, not 500 miles of Continuous Concrete Sprawl, with permanently preserved farmland greenbelts around every major city, with connected open space rings that link the entire state together. Think it'll never happen? It already is. Read the success stories on our website!
--the California "Mega-Park" Project
READ OUR EDITOR ON FACEBOOK: facebook.com/rex.frankel
Saturday, November 14, 2015
WCB 11/2015: State Owned Wilderness to Grow by 4300 Acres
Thursday, March 19, 2015
WCB 11/2014 to 3/2015: More Critter Parks...
11/2014: https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=91387
Metcalf Meadow, Recovery Land Acquisition Grant (2013), San Bernardino County $570,000
Friday, May 4, 2012
WCB 5/2012: State wildlife land buys for May 2012...
NOTICE OF MEETING
preliminary agenda:
http://www.nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=46452
MAPS: https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=54666
SOLANO COUNTY: 2910 ACRES
LOS ANGELES COUNTY: 1030 ACRES
Chalk Mountain phase 2--4024 acre forest conservation easement in Humboldt county---$2 million
Little Chico Creek Oak Woodland Conservation Easement $315,000 Butte County
679 acres in Daugherty Hill wildlife area-expansion 13, in Butte County, $2.7 million
WITHDRAWN FROM AGENDA-POSTPONED TO 8/2012 MEETING
47 acres in San Diego County-El Cajon
92 acres in San Diego County--Michelson
763 acres in Suisun Marsh in Solano County, $1.5 million
982 acres in Suisun Marsh--Grizzly Ranch in Solano County, $2 million
1165 acres in Rockville Trail Estates in Solano County, $2.8 million
1030 acres in Soledad Canyon in Los Angeles County, Nominn property, $2.48 million
Monday, October 24, 2011
WCB 12/2011: more CA land saved...
from the agenda of the 12/8/2011 meeting of the California Wildlife Conservation Board
San Joaquin Multi-Species Conservation Plan 2008 Vaquero Farm Central in Contra Costa County, acquire 320± acres
Western Riverside County MSHCP, Expansion 6
Goodwin Sierra Valley Ranch Conservation Easement in Plumas County
Webber Lake/Lacey Meadows in Sierra and Nevada Counties
Friday, May 20, 2011
WCB 2/2011 to 6/2011
Includes outright purchase of 2342 acres and purchase of “conservation easements” on another 25,173 acres
http://cdfgnews.wordpress.com/2011/06/page/7/
HIGHLIGHTS:
Mono County—108 acres
Santa Cruz—8.5 acres
Fresno--.15 acres
Palm Springs—70 acres
Western Riverside co—715 acres
San Diego--250 acres
Lassen Foothills—8455 acres
Sierra Crest—2683 acres
Mendocino co—Willits—8544 acres
Sonoma co—4046 acres
Contra Costa co—1159 acres
Half Moon Bay/San Mateo co—140 acres
San Luis Obispo—1337 acres
-----------------------------------------
NOTICE OF MEETING--WILDLIFE CONSERVATION BOARD--June 2, 2011
FOR FULL AGENDA:
http://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=29798
FOR MAPS OF ALL PURCHASES: https://goo.gl/photos/4sCAiQdbBKFFu3si9
Wheeler Ridge Wildlife Area, $550,000 Expansion 3, Mono County
--grant to Eastern Sierra Land Trust to acquire a conservation easement over 108± acres located south of the town of Mammoth Lakes and north of the town of Bishop in Mono County.
Santa Cruz Long-Toed Salamander, $60,000 Larkin Valley Santa Cruz County
--acquisition in fee of 8.5± acres at the northwest corner of Larkin Valley Road and Metiver's Way in Santa Cruz County.
San Joaquin Fish Hatchery (Hovannisian Property) $28,500 Fresno County
-- acquire a fee title to 0.15± acres of land for future public access to the San Joaquin River Parkway and the San Joaquin Fish Hatchery.
Thousand Palms Conservation Area (Gabison) $705,000 Riverside County
-- acquiring 70± acres of land located west of the City of Thousand Palms
Western Riverside County MSHCP (2006), $1,704,650 Expansions 6—9 --to acquire four properties totaling 715± acres. .
San Diego County MSCP/HCPLA 2009 (Gibson) $885,000 -- to acquire in fee 250± acres located south of Interstate 8 and northwest of Harbison Canyon Road in San Diego County.
Lassen Foothills, Expansion 6 (Gaumer Ranch) $2,545,000 Tehama County
-- a grant to The Nature Conservancy to acquire a conservation easement over 8,455± acres of land for protection of deer and mountain lion habitat, and native oak woodlands, located within the Deer Creek watershed in southeast Tehama County and approximately six miles east of Highway 99.
Sierra Crest Conservation Easement, Phase III $2,420,000 Sierra County
-- a grant to the Truckee Donner Land Trust to acquire a conservation easement over 2,683± acres located approximately 16 miles northwest of the town of Truckee, in close proximity to Webber Lake, in Sierra County.
Eel River Peninsula $8,559,000 Mendocino County
-- a grant to Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation to acquire a conservation easement over 8,544± acres of threatened and endangered species habitat, deer range habitat, oak woodlands and old growth forests, wildlife corridors, riparian areas and to provide future wildlife oriented public use opportunities, located east of the town of Willits in Mendocino County.
Baxter Ranch $2,360,242 Sonoma County
--to acquire a conservation easement over 4,046± acres within the Coastal Range, in close proximity to the Lake Sonoma Recreational Area, 10 miles west of the City of Cloverdale, in Sonoma County.
San Joaquin Multi-Species Conservation Plan $1,847,966 (Thomas) Contra Costa County
-- to acquire 1,159± acres in the Diablo range within the City of Pittsburg east of the town of Clayton.
Pillar Point Bluff Complex $3,010,000 San Mateo County
--to acquire in fee 140± acres along the Pacific Ocean immediately to the west of the Half Moon Bay Airport near the town of Half Moon Bay.
Nick Ranch Conservation Easement $2,375,000 San Luis Obispo County
--a grant to the Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County to acquire a conservation easement over 1,337± acres of land for the protection of rangeland, grazing land and grassland areas, located approximately 20 miles east of the City of San Luis Obispo, near the small rural community of Pozo, within the Salinas River watershed and next to the federally designated Machesna Mountain Wilderness and the Los Padres National Forest, within San Luis Obispo County.
Gualala River--discussion of 14,000 acre conservation easement purchase; approved at 9/2011 meeting
----------------------------------------
https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=31265&inline=1
FOR MAPS OF WCB PURCHASES: https://goo.gl/photos/9akMd2P2oLy1mTzV8
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Developer threatens San Joaquin River Park
from http://riverparkway.org
Dear Parkway Supporter,
On Tuesday, February 1, 2011, the Fresno County Board of Supervisors will vote on the Friant Ranch Development Project. This project, located across Friant Road from Lost Lake Park, will develop 2500 homes along with associated streets and utilities. This project will dramatically impact Lost Lake Park by concentrating a large group of users directly across from the park entrance. The project will also impact the park with the construction of a new wastewater treatment plant in the riverbottom adjacent to Lost Lake Park.
Please contact the Fresno County Board of Supervisors to voice your concerns about the threat the Friant Ranch Development poses to the San Joaquin River Parkway. You can contact Board Chairman Supervisor Phil Larson by clicking here to send your email: jbarlow@co.fresno.ca.us
The River Parkway Trust has two primary concerns with the Friant Ranch Project:
The Wastewater Treatment Plant will be in the Riverbottom and Blights Lost Lake Park: Friant Ranch proposes to build a waste water treatment plant in the riverbottom and immediately adjacent to Lost Lake Park. The plant would have a 20,000 square foot industrial processing plant, plus it will empty its waste water into huge gravel pits surrounding Lost Lake Park. We find the combination of the potential water quality impacts, not to mention the offensive scenic impacts, to be unacceptable. The plant will be BIG, big enough to handle the waste from the 2,500 homes of Friant Ranch, plus the whole Friant community, including any future expansion. The location brings the possibility of contaminants from pharmaceuticals and other chemicals leaching their way to the river, affecting fish and families alike. The developers have other options for locating the plant. Why take the risk of locating it in the riverbottom?
Nothing's In Place to Help Parks-The Friant Ranch development is designed for new home buyers that want to take advantage of its location adjacent to Lost Lake Park, the San Joaquin River Parkway, and Millerton State Park. Yet the Friant Ranch project did not study what impacts its 6,000 new residents will have on these public resources nor is there anything in place to help pay for Park impacts. Why should our public parks bear the extra burden?
For these reasons, the Trust's Board of Directors asks for your help to let the Board of Supervisors know that the Friant Ranch Project is a bad idea. We join with many other civic groups and agencies including, Revive the San Joaquin, League of Women Voters, Sierra Club, Fresno County Democratic Party, Central Valley Water and the Consortium and Women's International League for Peace and Freedom.
Here's what you can do:
1. Email the Fresno County Board of Supervisors today. Click here to email Board Chairman Supervisor Phil Larson.
2. Come to the public hearing, Tuesday, February 1 at 2:00pm. The meeting will be held at the Fresno County Hall of Records, 2281 Tulare St, Room 301.
With good planning, we can have vibrant communities and a healthy San Joaquin River Parkway. Write to your County Supervisors today!
On behalf of our Board of Directors,
Dave Koehler, Executive Director
http://www.riverparkway.org
For 22 years, the Trust has been working to create a 22-mile Parkway along the San Joaquin River. Support from our members and volunteers, and grants from public agencies, have enabled us to protect over 3,500 acres of open land for people living in the Fresno/Madera area and restore hundreds of acres for the plants and animals that live in and along the river.
http://www.facebook.com/SJRPCT
http://parkwayview.wordpress.com/ THEIR NEW BLOG
Since our founding in 1988, we've been working, with support from friends like you, to create a 22-mile Parkway along the San Joaquin River. We want to leave a legacy of open space for the rapidly urbanizing Fresno/Madera region.
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Water-less farms may go solar instead....
Excerpted from PCL's Insider for 3/19/2010
Earlier this week, a private investment group with land in the Westlands Water District announced its intention to farm a new crop in California 's Central Valley : the sun's energy. The proposed Westlands Solar Park would take 30,000 acres of fallow land and provide 5,000 megawatts of renewable energy - enough to power between 2.5 million and 4 million homes in California .
As an agricultural district with junior water rights, the Westlands Water District has frequently been the center of controversy. Most recently, it attempted to overturn California 's Endangered Species Act in a desperate water grab that would have maximized the profits of the agribusiness tycoons that Westlands serves, but risked driving California 's salmon to extinction.
However, the new proposal for solar in the district has drawn a broad base of support from nontraditional allies, including the Sierra Club and the Planning and Conservation League, who are hopeful that the proposed project will make California a leader in carbon-free energy generation and create solar installation, operations, and maintenance jobs in an area with high historic levels of structural unemployment.
Thursday, December 31, 2009
anything for a buck--Nucular in Fresno?
Nuclear plant near Fresno planned
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-nuke30-2009dec30,0,493029.story
12/30/2009
A French company and a group of Central Valley investors announced Tuesday that they had signed a letter of intent to build one or two nuclear power plants near Fresno....
Environmentalists were skeptical that the agreement would go anywhere. They point out that California has a 3-decade-old law that bans the construction of nuclear power plants unless the state can certify that the federal government has come up with a plan for the permanent storage of spent nuclear fuel, which is highly radioactive. No such facility exists in the country, and plans to open one at Yucca Mountain in Nevada have been put on hold by the Obama administration.
The California ban doesn't trouble the California investors.
"The law is archaic and will fall by the wayside on its own, in our opinion," Hutson said....
"I would not invest or bet money on nuclear plants being permitted and having a source of financing two years from now," said Jim Metropulos, a senior advocate in Sacramento with the Sierra Club.
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
San Joaquin River Parkway
Drawing a Northerly Limit to the Sprawl of Fresno

http://www.sjrc.ca.gov/ --State Agency buying up land
http://www.riverparkway.org/ --a private group helping out...
Monday, March 9, 2009
A Look at 4 Preserves in East Fresno County's Sierra Foothills
http://www.sierrafoothill.org/preserves.htm
list of preserves owned by the Sierra Foothills Conservancy
At this moment in its history, the Sierra Foothill Conservancy is the proud owner of four nature preserves: the Mary Elizabeth Miller Preserve at Black Mountain the McKenzie Table Mountain Preserve, the Tivy Mountain Preserve and the Austin & Mary Ewell Memorial Preserve at Fine Gold Creek. Although they are all located in the Sierra Nevada foothills of
http://www.sierrafoothill.org/fine_gold_06.htm
on 719 acres Ewell preserve
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Fresno: To Urbanize or Not: That is the Question
excerpted from http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2009/02/to_urbanize_or.html
By Alan Kandel, 2/18/2009
In the “Modern Farmland Conservation Program For Fresno County,” a “Report to the Council of Fresno County Governments by American Farmland Trust, December 2008,” reveals that “One-sixth of Fresno’s most strategic farmland is located inside or within one-half mile of city spheres of influence, highlighting the central challenge of minimizing the loss of this land by increasing the efficiency of urban development.”...
“Based on computerized mapping of these characteristics, 559,000 acres of Fresno’s 2.2 million acres of agricultural land were identified as the most strategic, i.e., the land that should receive the highest priority for conservation, and the lowest priority for non-farm development as part of a broad strategy to sustain Fresno County agriculture.”...
“Between 1990 and 2004, about 21,500 acres of Fresno County land were developed, one-fifth of all the land developed since the City of Fresno was founded more than 130 years ago. Because most development took place on the edges of existing cities, 69 percent of all the land developed was prime or unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance.
An acre of land was developed for every 9.4 new residents, which was somewhat more efficient than the 8.1 people per acre in the San Joaquin Valley as a whole. But it was far less efficient than development in other regions of the state, even those that are more suburban than urban, demonstrating that developing less land per capita is entirely possible and that much of the farmland being lost in Fresno County is unnecessary,” according to information in the report.
Here’s the kicker. “If no change in current development patterns occurs, another 97,600 acres of land will be urbanized in Fresno County by 2050, roughly doubling the current urbanized area. Of this, 67,350 acres (105 square miles) is likely to be prime, unique or statewide important farmland and most, if not all of that will be ‘strategic’ farmland.
Moreover, if rural residential development, which now occupies roughly one-quarter of all developed land in the county, continues apace, another 55,000 acres could be removed from agriculture.” If this isn’t telling and doesn’t paint a foreboding picture of possible things to come, honestly, I don’t know what does.
That definitive answer I referred to above? That seems obvious. In case there is still a question, does smart growth developmental patterns mean anything?
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
San Joaquin Valley Ag-Drainage Polluters Get 90 Day Deadline for Action
From the PCL Insider, 11/7/2008
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
The Latest News on New Parks in the Southern San Joaquin Valley;
And Some Loose scraps on Tejon Ranch
State eyes 2,300 acres in
http://www.visaliatimesdelta.com/article/20081117/NEWS01/81117011/1002
11/15/2008: To the surprise of local officials, California State Parks is holding a public workshop in
A 2,300-acre park at Rocky Hill in
A 1,000-acre park at Deer Creek south of
A 500-acre water trail park on the Kings River in
http://www.fresnobee.com/columnists/griswold/story/1015782.html
------------------------------------
Pictures of Tejon Ranch from a travel blog:
http://www.california-travel-blog.com/california-travel-blog/2008/10/12/tejon-ranch-ca.html
----------------------
Water agency strikes deal with Tejon Ranch
9/25/2008: PALMDALE - Drought conditions and other circumstances have forced water purveyors in
In response to this year's water shortage, Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency board members on Tuesday night unanimously approved a memorandum of understanding with Tejon Ranch Corp. for the transfer of 8,393 acre-feet of supplemental water that Tejon Ranch had purchased as backup but does not need anytime soon.
http://www.sfvbj.com/article.asp?aID=04356825.1467909.1686100.390602.7152601.051&aID2=129691
----------------------
The latest Tejon Ranch propaganda:
http://www.tejonranch.com/conservation/cons_partnership.asp
http://www.tejonranch.com/index.asp
-------------------------------------
Tejon Ranch’s stock is trading at close to half its price when the April 2008 enviro-deal was announced; today it’s around $25; when the deal was announced it was $45
http://quote.morningstar.com/Quote/Quote.aspx?ticker=TRC
Monday, November 17, 2008
Since the inception of the San Joaquin River Parkway and Conservation Trust 20 years ago, 3,500 acres of land along the San Joaquin River have been acquired and are protected under public ownership.
But the River Parkway is only halfway complete...
We need your help to ensure that all 6,000 acres of precious land planned for the Parkway are available to the public so that everyone can experience the natural wonders of our Valley. We need your help to create more safe outdoor places for families, with new trails, picnic areas and river access points.
Join in the effort to complete the Parkway.
http://riverparkway.org/
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Developer-Friendly Interpretation of State Law by City Leads to Numerous Losses in Court
http://www.fresnobee.com/news/local-news/story/899308.html
excerpted from the Fresno Bee, Sept. 28. 2008
Since the start of 2005, 10 CEQA actions against Fresno have been decided, and the city won just once. Fresno settled six cases and lost three -- the losses coming in appellate court decisions made during a 14-month period ending in May....
Fresno finds that projects are likely to produce significant effects far less often than other similar-sized cities in California, The Fresno Bee found in an analysis of CEQA records sent to the state.
In a 10-year period ending in July, Fresno required a full environmental review for nine out of 73 projects, or 12% of the time, according to the CEQA database.
By comparison, California's 20 biggest cities, except Los Angeles and San Diego, required a full environmental review for 26% of projects.
The results seem to indicate that Fresno is reluctant to require a full review, said McCoy of the Information Center for the Environment, which maintains the database....
The city erred by allowing developer DeWayne Zinkin to pay just $44,000 for the traffic the shopping center would add to Highway 41, when Caltrans estimated the fee at $307,000, the court said. Fresno's decision would leave the public "holding the financial bag," the court said...
As a result, the city failed to make a reasonable effort to offset the effects of development, a key CEQA requirement, the court said.
The city violated the other key part of CEQA by failing to inform the public about the likely effects of the shopping center, the court found.
The court said the city's reviews were "deeply flawed": Instead of comparing the project's expected effects against existing conditions, the city wrongly based its review on a comparison with a "massive hypothetical office park," creating a "misleading report." The city staff misrepresented findings to the City Council, which received them at the last minute, the court said...
Sunday, August 3, 2008
Victory for Sierra Club and the Giant Sequoias!
The win came at the 11th hour, as the Sierra Club legal team prepared to appear in the Ninth Circuit court to argue the last case standing, a last-ditch appeal by the timber industry, regarding commercial logging in the Monument. But on the eve of the hearing, they abandoned and withdrew their appeal—putting the final nail in the coffin of this very drawn out case—and putting an end to the pillage of these iconic trees.
Beginning in 1901, when John Muir lobbied for the expansion of Sequoia National Park to encompass the entire range of the giant sequoia, the Sierra Club has advocated for the protection of giant sequoia ecosystems in their entirety. And, after years of fighting to keep our towering Sequoia trees safe from the timber industry's saws, we have finally won. Thanks to this hard-earned victory, our children and grandchildren will be able to stand in awe of these noble giants for generations to come.
A Guide to Giant Sequoia Groves of California
This list is intended to serve as a guide to where to find Giant Sequoias in California. Some groves are easily accessed via the Kern River Valley while most are accessed via the westside of the Sierra Nevada off of Highways 99 or 65. There are approximately 35,000-38,000 acres of giant sequoias in the Sierra Nevada; most of these are in Tulare County. Many groves are accessible via paved road, although most are subject to winter road closures. Contact the agency listed to learn of current conditions. Bold type means the grove is open year-round. Italicized type means groves are accessible via paved road.
| Grove | County | Forest | Highway # | Roads | Hike |
| Agnew | Fresno | Sequoia NF | 180 | 14S11 to 13S11 | cross country |
| Alder Creek | Tulare | Sequoia NF | 190 | Road 216 to Sequoia Crest | |
| Atwell | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | Mineral King Road | South on Atwell Mill Trail |
| Bearskin | Fresno | Sequoia NF | 180 | Tenmile Creek Rd 13S09 to 13S02 | |
| Big Stump | Tulare | Kings Canyon | 180 | on highway | |
| Black Mountain | Tulare | Sequoia NF | 190 | Coy Flat at Camp Nelson to south 21S94 | |
| Board Camp | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | South Fork Road | South Fork Trail then cross-country |
| Boulder Creek | Fresno | Sequoia NF | 198 | 14S02 to 13S23 | |
| Burro Creek | Tulare | Sequoia NF | 190 | Wishon Dr. to River Road | Griswold trail then cross-country |
| Cahoon Creek | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | Mineral King Road | Atwell Mill Trail then cross-country |
| Case Mountain | Tulare | BLM | 198 | No public access | trail |
| Castle Creek | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | at Giant Forest | Middle Fork Trail then cross-country |
| Cherry Gap | Fresno | Sequoia NF | 180 | 13S97 to 13S58 | |
| Coffee Pot Canyon | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | Mineral King Road to Lookout Point | cross-country |
| Cunningham | Tulare | Sequoia NF | Western Divide Hwy | SM107 to 22S08 | |
| Dennison | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | Road 296 to Road 276 | cross country |
| Devils Canyon | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | Road 296 to Road 276 | cross country |
| Dillonwood | Tulare | Sequoia NF | 190 | private | |
| East Fork | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | Mineral King Road | South on Atwell Mill Trail |
| Eden Creek | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | Mineral King Road | Atwell Mill then cross-country |
| Evans | Fresno | Sierra | 180 | Tenmile Creek Rd 13S09 to 13S05 | hike |
| Freeman Creek | Tulare | Sequoia NF | Mtn 50 | 22S82 to 20S78 | Freeman Creek Trail |
| Garfield | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | South Fork Road | trail |
| Giant Forest | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | Crescent Meadow- Moro Rock Road | |
| Grant | Fresno | Kings Canyon | 180 | short paved road | |
| Homers Nose | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | South Fork Road | South Fork Trail then cross-country |
| Horse Creek | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | Mineral King Road | Atwell Mill then cross-country |
| Indian Basin | Fresno | Sequoia NF | 180 | on highway | |
| Kennedy | Fresno | Sequoia NF | 180 | 14S02 to 13S53 | dirt road 13S53 |
| Landslide | Fresno | Sequoia NF | 198 | Tenmile Creek Road 13S09 | closed road 13S33 |
| Little Boulder Creek | Fresno | Sequoia NF | 198 | 14S02 | dirt road 13S53 |
| Lockwood | Fresno | Sequoia NF | 180 | Tenmile Creek Road 13S09 to 13S05 | |
| Long Meadow | Tulare | Sequoia NF | Western Divide Hwy SM107 | on highway | Trail of 100 Giants parking costs $5 |
| Lost | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | on highway | |
| Maggie Mountain | Tulare | Sequoia NF | 190 | Road 220 to River Road | Griswold trail then cross-country |
| Mariposa | Mariposa | Yosemite | 41 | paved road | |
| McIntyre | Tulare | Sequoia NF | 190 | Belknap Campground | |
| McKinley | Fresno | Sierra | 168 | McKinley Grove Road | |
| North Calaveras | Calaveras | Stanislaus | 4 | State Park Rd. | |
| North Cold Spring | Tulare | Tule River IR | no public access | ||
| Oriole | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | Mineral King Road | Squirrel Creek Road then cross-country |
| Oriole | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | Mineral King Road | Squirrel Creek Road then cross-country |
| Packsaddle | Tulare | Sequoia NF | Mtn. 50 | 22S82 to 23S64 | |
| Parker Peak | Tulare | Tule River IR | no public access | ||
| Peyrone | Tulare | Sequoia NF | 190 | Coy Flat turnoff to Camp Nelson | |
| Pine Ridge | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | Dorst Campground | Trail to Muir Grove then cross-country |
| Placer County | Placer | Eldorado NF | 80 | Forest Hill Rd. to 96 Rd. | |
| Red Hill | Tulare | Sequoia NF | 190 | Coy Flat turnoff at Camp Nelson to 21S94 | closed dirt road |
| Redwood Meadow | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | Middle Fork trail & Cliff Creek trail | |
| Redwood Mountain | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | dirt road | Redwood Saddle trail |
| Sequoia Creek | Tulare | Kings Canyon | 180 | trail | |
| Silver Creek | Tulare | Mountain Home SF | 190 | Road 220 to River Road | Silver Creek to trail then cross-country |
| Skagway | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | Dorst Campground | Cross-country |
| South Calaveras | Tuolumne | Stanislaus | 4 | State Park Rd. | trail |
| South Fork | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | South Fork Road | South-fork trail then cross-country |
| South Peyrone | Tulare | Sequoia NF | 190 | Coy Flat turnoff to 21S94 | |
| Starvation Creek | Tulare | Sequoia NF | Mtn 50 | SM107 to SM50 to 23S64 | |
| Surprise | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | South Fork Road | South Fork trail near Clough Cave then cross-country |
| Suwanee | Tulare | Sequoia NP | 198 | cross country | |
| Tuolumne | Tuolumne | Yosemite | 120 | closed paved road | |
| Wishon | Tulare | Mountain Home SF | 190 | Wishon Dr. to River Road | trail Wishon Fork Tule River |
All information copyright Nature Ali 2007. All rights reserved.
LA meetuphikes.org
VISIONS, HISTORY AND RESEARCH:
- VISIONS OF CONNECTED OPEN SPACES
- 9/2007 NEW PARKS SINCE 2000
- 12/2015 UPDATE: Websites of All California Land-Saving Groups
- NORTH COAST-NEW PARKS 2000-2011
- SF BAY--NEW PARKS 2000-2011
- CENTRAL COAST--NEW PARKS 2000-2011
- SIERRA NEVADA/CENTRAL VALLEY--NEW PARKS 2000-2011
- LOS ANGELES COUNTY & SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS--NEW PARKS 2000-2011
- SO-CAL--NEW PARKS 2000-2011
- STATEWIDE LAND PRESERVATION ISSUES AND GROUPS
- CA LAND TRUSTS SUMMARY 10-10-2017
- CA Wildlife Board Purchases 2000 to 2017
- All State Agency Land Purchase from 2000-01 to 2017-11
- 2012-12-02 CA Park purchases summary
L.A.-So. Cal-Desert Blogs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Rex's Photo Albums9 years ago
-
In every bottle, a creek…9 years ago
-
New Anza Borrego Desert Tribute Site10 years ago
-
-
Rally to Celebrate Elephant Hills11 years ago
-
-
-
SF Bay blogs:
Central Coast blogs:
-
Ventura Promenade repairs 20262 months ago
Central Valley-Sierra Nevada blogs:
Northern Calif. blogs:
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Marina Center is Dead12 years ago
-
Assorted California Enviro blogs:
E-Mail the editor:
Quick-Search of Subjects on the Site
- Alameda (13)
- Alpine County (6)
- Amador (5)
- Baldwin Hills (4)
- Ballona (4)
- Big Sur (3)
- Blue Ridge-Berryessa Natural Area (17)
- Bolsa Chica Wetlands (1)
- Butte County (7)
- Calaveras (14)
- California Land Preservation (18)
- Carrizo Plain (6)
- Chino Hills (5)
- Claremont (1)
- Clean Water Act (7)
- Cleveland National Forest (1)
- Clover Valley (6)
- Coachella Valley (4)
- Coastal Conservancy (54)
- Colusa County (2)
- contra costa (42)
- Del Norte (12)
- desert protection (50)
- East L.A. Hills (10)
- El Dorado (23)
- Endangered Species (27)
- Environmental Laws (24)
- Federal Lands (12)
- Forests and logging (4)
- Fresno (19)
- Glenn County (3)
- Humboldt (88)
- Humboldt Bay (2)
- Imperial (7)
- inyo (12)
- Kern (58)
- Kings (1)
- Klamath River (9)
- Lake County (11)
- Lake Shasta (2)
- Lake Tahoe (4)
- Lassen County (11)
- Lassen Foothills (3)
- Los Angeles (153)
- Madera (8)
- Maps of open spaces (5)
- Marin (24)
- Mariposa (3)
- Mendocino (47)
- Merced (9)
- Modoc (1)
- Mono (15)
- Mono Lake (2)
- Monterey (34)
- Mount Hamilton project (4)
- Mount Whitney (2)
- Napa (28)
- Nevada County (17)
- Newhall Ranch (7)
- North Coast (12)
- Nuclear power (2)
- oak trees (3)
- off-road parks (1)
- Onyx Ranch (6)
- Orange (49)
- Pacific Lumber (36)
- Palm Springs (1)
- Passenger Rail Revival (9)
- Pebble Beach (1)
- Pinnacles National Monument (2)
- Placer (35)
- Plumas (11)
- Population Growth (5)
- prescriptive easements (1)
- Quay Valley Ranch (1)
- Rex Frankel (35)
- River Restoration (7)
- Riverside (63)
- Rocketdyne (2)
- Sacramento (7)
- Sacramento River (5)
- Salton Sea (2)
- San Benito (9)
- San Bernardino (33)
- San Diego (75)
- San Francisco Bay (28)
- San Francisco city and county (8)
- San Gabriel Mountains Foothills (16)
- San Jacinto River (1)
- San Joaquin Valley (2)
- San Luis Obispo (39)
- san mateo (35)
- Santa Barbara (34)
- santa clara (31)
- Santa Clara River (14)
- Santa Cruz (22)
- Santa Monica Mountains (56)
- Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy-MRCA (74)
- Santa Susana Mountains (13)
- Send 'em your cash (1)
- Shasta County (11)
- Sierra County (27)
- Sierra Pacific Industries (9)
- Simi Hills (6)
- Siskiyou (17)
- Solano (18)
- Solar Power (12)
- Sonoma (49)
- Stanislaus (7)
- stormwater pollution cleanup (5)
- Sutter County (4)
- TANC power line proposal--Sacramento River Valley (2)
- Tehama (16)
- Tejon Ranch (48)
- Toll Roads (16)
- Trails (3)
- Treatment Wetlands (2)
- Trinity county (5)
- Truckee River (1)
- Tulare (14)
- Tulare Lake Basin (2)
- Tuolumne (6)
- Urban Growth Boundaries (7)
- Ventura (56)
- Verdugo Mountains (5)
- Water (67)
- Westlands Water District (7)
- Whittier-Chino Hills Wildlife Corridor (14)
- Wildfires (1)
- Wildflowers (1)
- Wildlife Conservation Board (68)
- Wildlife Crossings over/under highways (1)
- Yolo (15)
- Yolo Bypass (2)
- yuba county (12)
- Zero waste--Don't just reduce (3)

